1964 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Plymouth Valiant | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Plymouth | Mazda |
Model | Valiant | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2789 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |