1964 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1964 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Plymouth Valiant | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Plymouth | Nissan |
Model | Valiant | Cube |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2789 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2530 mm |