1964 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2013 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 4,474 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Plymouth Valiant | 2013 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | Plymouth | Volkswagen |
Model | Valiant | Golf |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4474 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2578 mm |