1964 Pontiac Bonneville vs. 1979 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1979 Zastava 1500 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 730 kg more than 1979 Zastava 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Pontiac Bonneville | 1979 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Pontiac | Zastava |
| Model | Bonneville | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6375 cc | 1479 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2430 mm |
