1964 Pontiac Bonneville vs. 2002 Renault Megane
To start off, 2002 Renault Megane is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 425 kg more than 2002 Renault Megane.
Because 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Pontiac Bonneville | 2002 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Pontiac | Renault |
| Model | Bonneville | Megane |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6375 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1345 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2530 mm |
