1964 Pontiac Bonneville vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Pontiac Bonneville | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Pontiac | Renault |
Model | Bonneville | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6375 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2630 mm |