1964 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2003 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2003 Renault Scenic II is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 118 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Scenic II weights approximately 80 kg more than 1964 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 1964 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Scenic II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Pontiac Tempest | 2003 Renault Scenic II | |
Make | Pontiac | Renault |
Model | Tempest | Scenic II |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3524 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2750 mm |