1964 Reliant Rebel vs. 2000 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2000 Toyota Crown is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Crown weights approximately 699 kg more than 1964 Reliant Rebel.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Reliant Rebel | 2000 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Reliant | Toyota |
Model | Rebel | Crown |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 600 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 521 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |