1964 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Reliant | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Sabre Six | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3690 mm |
