1964 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 373 kg more than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Reliant | Triumph |
| Model | Sabre Six | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 91 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 797 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 64 L |
