1964 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1303 kg more than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Reliant | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Sabre Six | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 6229 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 797 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 109 L |
