1964 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 1982 Buick Century is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Century (110 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Buick Century (197 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 1982 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Reliant Sabre Six | 1982 Buick Century | |
Make | Reliant | Buick |
Model | Sabre Six | Century |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 197 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1364 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2662 mm |