1964 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2008 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Musso is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 1108 kg more than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 2008 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 SsangYong Musso (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | 2008 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Reliant | SsangYong |
| Model | Sabre Six | Musso |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 22.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 797 kg | 1905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 80 L |
