1964 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2010 Peugeot 408

To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (110 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.

Because 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 408. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 408.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Reliant Sabre Six 2010 Peugeot 408
Make Reliant Peugeot
Model Sabre Six 408
Year Released 1964 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2552 cc 1587 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 110 HP
Torque 185 Nm 147 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4250 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1815 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1525 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2710 mm