1964 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2011 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2011 Peugeot 207 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot 207 (121 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | 2011 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Reliant | Peugeot |
| Model | Sabre Six | 207 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 121 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1397 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 50 L |
