1964 Reliant Scimitar vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1964 Reliant Scimitar is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 447 kg more than 1964 Reliant Scimitar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Reliant Scimitar | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Reliant | Studebaker |
Model | Scimitar | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1964 | 1956 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 4735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1003 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2980 mm |