1964 Reliant Scimitar vs. 2003 Toyota Echo
To start off, 2003 Toyota Echo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Reliant Scimitar (120 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Echo. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Reliant Scimitar should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Echo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Echo weights approximately 7 kg more than 1964 Reliant Scimitar.
Because 1964 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Echo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Reliant Scimitar (190 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Echo. (157 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Reliant Scimitar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Echo.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Reliant Scimitar | 2003 Toyota Echo | |
Make | Reliant | Toyota |
Model | Scimitar | Echo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 84.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1003 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2590 mm |