1964 Reliant Scimitar vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Reliant Scimitar (120 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Reliant Scimitar should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1964 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Reliant Scimitar | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Reliant | Ford |
Model | Scimitar | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2490 mm |