1964 Reliant Scimitar vs. 2013 Ford EDGE

To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford EDGE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford EDGE (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. (120 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford EDGE weights approximately 837 kg more than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford EDGE (343 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. (190 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2013 Ford EDGE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Reliant Scimitar.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Reliant Scimitar 2013 Ford EDGE
Make Reliant Ford
Model Scimitar EDGE
Year Released 1964 2013
Body Type Coupe Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2553 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 120 HP 281 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 343 Nm
Torque RPM 2600 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.6 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1003 kg 1840 kg
Vehicle Length 4250 mm 4679 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 2223 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1702 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2824 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]