1964 Renault 4 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1964 Renault 4 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 516 kg more than 1964 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Renault 4 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | 4 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 654 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 64 L |
