1964 Renault 4 vs. 2009 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2009 Toyota Tundra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Tundra (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 420 kg more than 1964 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Renault 4 | 2009 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 4 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 233 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 654 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 50 L |