1964 Renault 4 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV weights approximately 516 kg more than 1964 Renault 4.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Renault 4 | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Renault | Mitsubishi |
Model | 4 | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 654 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2550 mm |