1964 Renault 4 vs. 2013 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2013 Subaru Forester is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Subaru Forester (168 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Forester weights approximately 874 kg more than 1964 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Renault 4 | 2013 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Renault | Subaru |
| Model | 4 | Forester |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 654 kg | 1528 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2006 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2615 mm |
