1964 Renault 8 vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1972 Triumph 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Renault 8 (95 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Renault 8 should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 392 kg more than 1964 Renault 8.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault 8. (99 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1972 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault 8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Renault 8 | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | 8 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 853 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2700 mm |
