1964 Riley One-Point-Five vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Riley One-Point-Five. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Riley One-Point-Five would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1964 Riley One-Point-Five. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Riley One-Point-Five.
Because 1964 Riley One-Point-Five is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Riley One-Point-Five. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Riley One-Point-Five | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Riley | Audi |
| Model | One-Point-Five | A6 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 75 L |
