1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2012 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 1249 kg more than 2012 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud has automatic transmission and 2012 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2012 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2012 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Daewoo |
Model | Silver Cloud | Matiz |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 50 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 144 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 851 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 35 L |