1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2013 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2013 Ford Explorer is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Explorer weights approximately 109 kg more than 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 2013 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2013 Ford Explorer | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Ford |
| Model | Silver Cloud | Explorer |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 360 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 2209 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 5006 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2291 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1803 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 70 L |
