1964 Rover P5 vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Rover P5 weights approximately 185 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 1964 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Rover P5. (219 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Rover P5 | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Rover | Rover |
Model | P5 | 75 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 219 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 105 mm | 82.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 65 L |