1964 Rover P5 vs. 2012 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Rover P5 (119 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot 508. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Rover P5 should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot 508.
Because 1964 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Rover P5 | 2012 Peugeot 508 | |
Make | Rover | Peugeot |
Model | P5 | 508 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 110 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1853 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2817 mm |