1964 Rover P6 vs. 2009 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2009 Ford Mondeo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P6 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mondeo (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1964 Rover P6. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1964 Rover P6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 296 kg more than 1964 Rover P6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Rover P6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rover P6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mondeo (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Rover P6. (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Rover P6. 2009 Ford Mondeo has automatic transmission and 1964 Rover P6 has manual transmission. 1964 Rover P6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Mondeo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Rover P6 | 2009 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | Rover | Ford |
Model | P6 | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.7 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.7 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 17.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |