1964 Seat 1500 vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (181 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW X5 weights approximately 995 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Seat 1500 | 2002 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Seat | BMW |
| Model | 1500 | X5 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 181 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
