1964 Seat 1500 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Seat 1500 (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Seat 1500 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Seat 1500 weights approximately 290 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Seat 1500 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Seat | Subaru |
Model | 1500 | R2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2370 mm |