1964 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1383 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Seat 1500 | 2010 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Seat | Chevrolet |
Model | 1500 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2543 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1951 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3302 mm |