1964 Seat 1500 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Seat 1500 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Seat | Jaguar |
Model | 1500 | XF |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 271 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2908 mm |