1964 Seat 1500 vs. 2013 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 300 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 300 (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 668 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Seat 1500 | 2013 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Seat | Chrysler |
Model | 1500 | 300 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1828 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5044 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1492 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3052 mm |