1964 Seat 1500 vs. 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser
To start off, 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser (256 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser weights approximately 803 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Seat 1500 | 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | 1500 | FJ Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1963 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2690 mm |
