1964 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Avenger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Avenger (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1964 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 600.
Because 1964 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Avenger (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Seat 600 | 2010 Dodge Avenger | |
Make | Seat | Dodge |
Model | 600 | Avenger |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 47 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1824 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1496 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2766 mm |