1964 Simca 1300 vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 180 kg more than 1964 Simca 1300.
Because 1964 Simca 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Simca 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Simca 1300 | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Simca | Nissan |
Model | 1300 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |