1964 Singer Vogue III vs. 1969 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1969 Toyota Corona is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 1,831 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Toyota Corona (95 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Singer Vogue III weights approximately 97 kg more than 1969 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Singer Vogue III | 1969 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Singer | Toyota |
| Model | Vogue III | Corona |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1831 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 51 L |
