1964 Singer Vogue III vs. 1995 Lincoln Mark VIII
To start off, 1995 Lincoln Mark VIII is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Lincoln Mark VIII is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Lincoln Mark VIII (280 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Lincoln Mark VIII should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Lincoln Mark VIII weights approximately 2665 kg more than 1964 Singer Vogue III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Singer Vogue III | 1995 Lincoln Mark VIII | |
Make | Singer | Lincoln |
Model | Vogue III | Mark VIII |
Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 3757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5265 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1361 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2870 mm |