1964 Singer Vogue III vs. 2008 BMW 316
To start off, 2008 BMW 316 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 316 (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW 316 weights approximately 283 kg more than 1964 Singer Vogue III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Singer Vogue III | 2008 BMW 316 | |
Make | Singer | BMW |
Model | Vogue III | 316 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 81 mm |
Top Speed | 148 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 63 L |