1964 Singer Vogue III vs. 2012 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2012 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Sequoia (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1658 kg more than 1964 Singer Vogue III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Singer Vogue III | 2012 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Singer | Toyota |
Model | Vogue III | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 2750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1956 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3099 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 100 L |