1964 Steyr 650T vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1964 Steyr 650T. (27 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1964 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 978 kg more than 1964 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Steyr 650T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Steyr 650T. (41 Nm). This means 2002 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Steyr 650T | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Steyr | Honda |
| Model | 650T | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2970 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2630 mm |
