1964 Steyr 650T vs. 2010 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 365 more horse power than 1964 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1964 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (515 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 474 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Steyr 650T. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Steyr 650T. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1964 Steyr 650T has manual transmission. 1964 Steyr 650T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: