1964 Steyr Haflinger vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Camry weights approximately 755 kg more than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Camry (268 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Steyr Haflinger | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Steyr | Toyota |
Model | Haflinger | Camry |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 643 cc | 2999 cc |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 268 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2840 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2730 mm |