1964 Sunbeam Alpine vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 4,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 953 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (128 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Sunbeam Alpine | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Sunbeam | Toyota |
Model | Alpine | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 4670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 415 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 87 L |