1964 Sunbeam Alpine vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 5,598 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (313 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (385 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (128 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Sunbeam Alpine | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Nissan |
| Model | Alpine | Titan |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1592 cc | 5598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 313 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 385 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2030 mm |
