1964 Sunbeam Imp vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1964 Sunbeam Imp is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,247 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Mayflower is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 203 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Imp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Sunbeam Imp | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Triumph |
| Model | Imp | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 875 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |
