1964 Sunbeam Imp vs. 2003 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Imp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Imp would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 753 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Imp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Chevrolet Corvette has automatic transmission and 1964 Sunbeam Imp has manual transmission. 1964 Sunbeam Imp will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet Corvette will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Sunbeam Imp | 2003 Chevrolet Corvette | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Chevrolet |
| Model | Imp | Corvette |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 875 cc | 5664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.4 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 53 L |
