1964 Sunbeam Imp vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Imp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Imp would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 968 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Imp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Sunbeam Imp | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Sunbeam | Chevrolet |
Model | Imp | Camaro |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 875 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 319 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.5 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 72 L |